HP 700-512nb

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-512nb  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141226
Uptime11.3 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 23:15
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 408
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 57.9
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 48.3
47% 54.1 fps
MRender 40.3
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 46.1
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000H1 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 50 53 39 44 51 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.2% Below average
Read 104
Write 36.8
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 49
14% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 11.1
50% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 46.5
DQ Mixed 45.1
74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
447GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 175 173 175 175 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 121
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 173
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
827GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 91 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 74.5
Write 72.1
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 89.9
55% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 14.4
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-512nb Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-512nb

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback