Notebook N9x0TC

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Notebook N9x0TC (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N9x0TC
Memory	58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190816
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '22 at 21:09
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 90.1 1-Core 143 2-Core 183 83% 139 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 627 65% 522 Pts	64-Core 652 40% 652 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Clevo(1558 951D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.4 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 21.9 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 10.6 Gravity 28.6 Splatting 38.9 23% 26 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87 58,572 User benchmarks, average bench 341% 290GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 1109 1157 1063 819 838 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 2466 Write 1,366 Mixed 1,505 SusWrite 1,009 353% 1,586 MB/s	4K Read 66.1 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 54.4 195% 56.1 MB/s	DQ Read 610 DQ Write 67.3 DQ Mixed 128 147% 268 MB/s
Poor: 206% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 442%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 287GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 279 291 315 316 358 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 499 Write 358 Mixed 288 SusWrite 306 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 24 86% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 68.8 DQ Mixed 127 112% 175 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB 5,545 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	MC Read 32 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 28.6 91% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 27.6 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N9x0TC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

System: Notebook N9x0TC

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	7x
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	5x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 65,338 samples	3x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $87Bench 341%, 58,572 samples	3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	1x

RAM
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 79%, 5,545 samples	2x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	2x
HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GBKingstonBench 85%, 10,266 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16