Lenovo 2555CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2555CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130607
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '22 at 20:04
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 360
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 849E) 3GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 89.7
55% 76.6 fps
MRender 81.7
Gravity 80.2
Splatting 60.9
59% 74.3 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA004R22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 97 286 198 176 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 434
Write 401
Mixed 359
SusWrite 198
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 29.7
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 220
167% 222 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 180 191 194 188 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 140
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 172
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B RM51264BA1339.16FR HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B RM51264BA1339.16FR 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2555CTO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2555CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback