| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
| Memory | 9.9 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110623 |
| Uptime | 3.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 06 '22 at 01:26 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
46%
Average
|
40% 63.2 Pts
|
22% 161 Pts
|
10% 165 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
13% 13.9 fps
|
11% 13.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 97 51 46 53 51 MB/s
|
43.2%
Average
|
35% 157 MB/s
|
74% 24.7 MB/s
|
82% 123 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.3%
Poor
|
20% 6.9 GB/s
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 275 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro MT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 53x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 37x |
| Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $100Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 90x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 20x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 17x |
| SSD |
|
|---|---|
| A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 8x |
| A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 6x |
| A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $137 |