Lenovo 7033AJ4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 7033AJ4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 21:59
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 83.5
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 134
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 134
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3070) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2.1
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 56 55 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 42.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 54.6
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
111GB free
Firmware: JPFOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71.9
Write 74.5
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 68.5
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 4.5 4.8 5.1 4.7 4.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Read 32.4
Write 5.2
Mixed 9
SusWrite 5.1
13% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
40% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 Apacer 75.A73C1.G02 6GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 7.5
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7033AJ4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7033AJ4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback