Hp-pavilion WC701AA-UUG HPE-120be

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion WC701AA-UUG HPE-120be (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100128
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '22 at 15:15
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$320 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 93.1 1-Core 60.7 2-Core 128 59% 94 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 237 22% 183 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 230 1,567 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(1B0A 9044) 1.5GB Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	3.15% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.6 3% 2.83 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 4.6 Splatting 2.8 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.15% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 303GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 208 213 211 214 192 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.8% Above average	Read 240 Write 220 Mixed 189 SusWrite 206 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 22 75% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 96.8 DQ Mixed 121 96% 135 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 129%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 450GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 75 75 76 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 74.5 Write 72.4 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 74.1 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 67%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 6.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 43 45 44 44 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 149 Write 50.9 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 42.3 93% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.8 191% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB 13,827 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 646GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 64 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 117 Write 93.8 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 62.6 109% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5584-007.A00LF 9801 99U5584-018.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WC701AA-UUG HPE-120be Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion WC701AA-UUG HPE-120be

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 230NvidiaBench 4%, 1,567 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
99U5584-007.A00LF 9801 99U5584-018.A00LF 8GBUnknownBench 22%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16