Acer Aspire E5-571G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HB
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150915
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 118
60% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 184
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Acer(1025 0867) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9709
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 13.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 12.3
11% 13.9 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 9.9
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 422 214 35 34 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 419
Write 236
Mixed 396
SusWrite 190
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 39.4
144% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 196
176% 262 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
779GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 103 104 92 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 94.3
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 100
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 16.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-571G Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback