bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DG33FB
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070502
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '22 at 13:20
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 29.1 2-Core 60.9 34% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 116 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GTS 2,598 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 0950) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 1.2 2% 1.7 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 98 32 127 27 74 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.3% Below average	Read 226 Write 112 Mixed 162 SusWrite 85 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 20 69% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 49.4 DQ Mixed 25.7 22% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 328GB free Firmware: 2AR20002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 77 76 77 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	39.1% Below average	Read 60.3 Write 44.4 Mixed 39.6 SusWrite 75.8 40% 55 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 59%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 146GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 106 105 106 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 68.9 Write 8 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 103 42% 56.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 61%
USB 3.0 500GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1GB free Firmware: 0508 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 27.1 Write 25.5 Mixed 23.3 19% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 67%
WDC WD50 00BPVT-00HXZT1 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 313GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 22.6 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 15.8 29% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 18%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 38GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 16 17 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 23.6 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 16.4 30% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,051x
Core i7-2600Intel $200Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,580x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	946x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	521x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	299x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16