Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X505ZA
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180830
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 08:11
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Memory 14.9
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 18.1
9% 14.5 Pts
4-Core 32.2
8-Core 53.1
5% 42.7 Pts
64-Core 49.7
3% 49.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 1091) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.6
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 72 68 44 48 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 62.7
Mixed 42
SusWrite 57.4
41% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 71%
USB 2.0 2.0 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.6
10% 9.22 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 7.1
16% 5.53 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 1
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 361
11% 361 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA Builds (Compare 233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop X505ZA_X505ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback