Overpowered OP-LP1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOverpowered OP-LP1  (all builds)
MotherboardOVERPOWERED GK5CN4Z
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180926
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 05:11
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 231
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 620
63% 512 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1044) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 32.1
26% 31.6 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 20.7
24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28128GPTCB3B-S112611 128GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 333
Mixed 326
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 27.8
108% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 180
156% 231 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
631GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 160 155 161 163 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 102
Write 131
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 157
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2666A 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OP-LP1 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Overpowered OP-LP1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback