Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 104% UFO	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	343% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 04 '22 at 01:45
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Memory 79 1-Core 168 2-Core 334 102% 194 Pts	4-Core 631 8-Core 1,230 110% 930 Pts	64-Core 2,880 178% 2,880 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8698) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	92.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 108 Parallax 112 95% 112 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 100 Splatting 91.5 88% 110 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117 5,089 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2445 2586 2634 2701 2697 1723 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	343% Outstanding	Read 1,908 Write 2,454 Mixed 1,963 SusWrite 2,464 498% 2,197 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 72.5 235% 85.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,130 DQ Write 790 DQ Mixed 935 705% 952 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 343% Great: 496%
SSD 960GB 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 666GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 424 459 460 449 458 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Read 300 Write 110 Mixed 95.1 SusWrite 449 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 11.9 56% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 15 11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 104%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 12TB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 10.5TB free Firmware: D785 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 233 237 239 230 237 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 244 Write 216 Mixed 131 SusWrite 235 46% 207 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 1.7 43% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 4.4 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 0.7 3% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 706GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 82 84 85 84 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 21.6 Write 92.2 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 76.9 36% 50.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 113%
WD My Book 25ED 6TB 496 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4.5TB free, PID 25ed Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 174 173 173 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 172 Mixed 103 SusWrite 174 212% 160 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 1 487% 10 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 1 424% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 668GB free, PID b208 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 93 94 94 93 95 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 143 Write 144 Mixed 20 SusWrite 94.1 127% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GB 1,793 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 57.6 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 29.3 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 28.9 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	842x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	298x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	227x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	92x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	74x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	181x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	128x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16