Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q920

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q920  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3233-A1
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 154
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 294
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,748
Write 3,624
Mixed 3689
893% 4,020 MB/s
4K Read 392
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 136
825% 212 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 941
DQ Mixed 1077
794% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
413GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 344 290 292 292 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 368
Write 368
Mixed 337
SusWrite 318
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 26.9
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 144
104% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 97%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
837GB free, PID fcd7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 41 43 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 38
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 41.4
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
926GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 37 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 35.5
Write 32.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 37.1
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 66%
SDXC Card 128GB
96GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 21 21 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 19.6
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 20.5
27% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
96% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 17.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO Q920 Builds (Compare 316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q920

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback