Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 361
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2108 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 77.9
Reflection 78.7
Parallax 72.7
64% 76.4 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 70.5
59% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922FS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 236 242 228 80 28 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.3% Above average
Read 256
Write 239
Mixed 231
SusWrite 159
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 30.4
100% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 151
117% 157 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 107%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
23GB free
Firmware: R0427AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 236 239 242 242 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 257
Write 241
Mixed 214
SusWrite 222
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 27.7
95% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 148
118% 162 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
19GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 99 122 123 141 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 121
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
27GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 28.7
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 28.8
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/4G 075D GR1333D364L9S/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 740 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback