Gateway FX510S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGateway FX510S  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel OEMD975XLAG1
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060711
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 16:46
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6400
J3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 54.1
35% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 52.8
8-Core 47.7
7% 50.2 Pts
64-Core 52.2
3% 52.2 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6770
Asus(1043 0414) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.3
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 12.9
12% 13.3 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 21 7.9 17 23 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 68.5
Write 72.3
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 24.2
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 43%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
287GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 65 62 62 63 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 63.8
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 59%
WD 1600BEV External 160GB
92GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 17.9
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
2GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 7.7 7.5 7.3 6.7 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 0.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.8
8% 8.23 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX510S Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway FX510S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback