| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar H81MHV3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170914 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 03 '22 at 13:52 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 56% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.4%
Good
|
64% 114 Pts
|
46% 344 Pts
|
17% 281 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.5%
Poor
|
24% 30.2 fps
|
23% 28.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 111 49 46 38 33 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
70% 316 MB/s
|
94% 31.1 MB/s
|
238% 316 MB/s
|
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-017.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
42% 95.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81MHV3 Builds (Compare 917 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H81MHV3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 126x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 86x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 85x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |