Asrock B560M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '22 at 13:45
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 216
84% 145 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 349
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 9BA8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 4.1
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 8.3
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IMPERION-256GB 256GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 547 722 660 685 487 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 1,477
Write 952
Mixed 815
SusWrite 570
212% 953 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 23.3
155% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 340
314% 470 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 162%
Great: 188%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
14GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 17 17 18 17 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 37.5
Write 18.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 15.6
29% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.3
158% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B560M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback