Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS (all builds)
Memory	7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140327
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '22 at 19:50
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 95 2-Core 188 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 338 47% 350 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 60.7 Reflection 63.3 Parallax 83.2 50% 69.1 fps	MRender 62.6 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 46.3 47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 70 16 15 17 15 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 171 Write 118 Mixed 110 SusWrite 27.1 24% 107 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 7.4 51% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 36.2 DQ Mixed 8.2 12% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46 8,198 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 9GB free Firmware: P22OABEA SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 36 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 42.8 Write 43.3 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 36.8 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 39%
Jmicron Generic 500GB 2,959 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 62GB free Firmware: 0405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 28 28 28 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 32.4 Write 26.1 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 28.1 21% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.1 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	20x
Core i3-2120Intel $147Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	15x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	10x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	16x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
S800 256GBRamstaBench 62%, 813 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x
99U5471-020.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 47%, 1,112 samples	7x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16