Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 73.1 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 87.5 43% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 351 36% 294 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290 24,657 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Asus(1043 03BE) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 27.6 Parallax 23.7 23% 26.5 fps	MRender 22.6 Gravity 22.2 Splatting 18.1 17% 21 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 208 209 211 212 211 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.6% Above average	Read 196 Write 212 Mixed 197 SusWrite 208 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 27.8 86% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 175 132% 175 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 3x8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3 of 12 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 21.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 94.4 42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	1x

GPU
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 3x8GBHynixBench 43%, 32 samples	1x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16