Asus N53Jq

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus N53Jq (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N53Jq
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '22 at 16:25
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Memory 67 1-Core 43.9 2-Core 39.9 37% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 68.1 8-Core 102 11% 85.1 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 425M 3,013 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1522) 1GB CLim: 560 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.7% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 5 Parallax 0.6 3% 2.93 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 2.6 3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.7% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 151GB free (System drive) Firmware: X312 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 164 163 171 173 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.7% Below average	Read 182 Write 153 Mixed 157 SusWrite 164 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 12.5 39% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 153 DQ Mixed 125 103% 147 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Asint SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 3x2GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	MC Read 10.6 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.7 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N53Jq Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N53Jq

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	42x
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	2x
Core i7 X 940Intel $150Bench 60%, 592 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 425MNvidiaBench 3%, 3,013 samples	45x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	5x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	4x
480GB SATA SSD 480GBPNYBench 80%, 729 samples	3x

RAM
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 2x2GBAsintBench 27%, 888 samples	5x
SSZ3128M8-EDJEF 3x2GBAsintBench 36%, 71 samples	4x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16