Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 100 41% 70.1 Pts	4-Core 97.4 8-Core 100 13% 98.8 Pts	64-Core 93.1 6% 93.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 84D0) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 5.7 3% 5.03 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.4 4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 806GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3402101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 268 317 289 359 379 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 452 Write 362 Mixed 358 SusWrite 308 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 24.6 101% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 115 107% 167 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.4% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	21x
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 8%, 2,318 samples	4x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	4x

SSD
SA400S37960G 960GBKingstonBench 70%, 56,609 samples	3x
MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 6,630 samples	1x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	4x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	4x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16