Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx  (all builds)
MotherboardAftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 11:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 584
62% 497 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6275
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 140
Parallax 133
96% 130 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 107
Splatting 102
94% 117 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 868 823 830 830 829 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,333
Write 1,128
Mixed 1,049
SusWrite 1,028
307% 1,384 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 84.7
280% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,089
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 904
679% 915 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 284%
Great: 355%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 133 132 132 131 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 123
Write 134
Mixed 51
SusWrite 131
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905712-035.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P95_96_97Ex,Rx Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Aftershock P95_96_97Ex,Rx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback