Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '22 at 08:18
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 90
2-Core 164
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 263
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Gigabyte(1458 227B) 1GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 31.7
22% 28.9 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 24.3
20% 23.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 180 183 101 100 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 442
Write 284
Mixed 319
SusWrite 135
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 36.7
141% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 204
176% 258 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
343GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 102
Write 83
Mixed 74
SusWrite 119
70% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G160081 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback