Fujitsu PRIMERGY MX130 S1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY MX130 S1  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2974
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 23:39
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
Socket AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 69
1-Core 41
2-Core 74.2
41% 61.4 Pts
4-Core 70
8-Core 66.7
9% 68.3 Pts
64-Core 72.9
4% 72.9 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1199) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 85 46 37 37 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 56.3
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB
20GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 5.1 3.6 3.6 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 13.3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 5.7
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
44% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY MX130 S1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY MX130 S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback