Asrock N68-VGS3 UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-VGS3 UCC  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110304
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron X2 190
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 92.8
47% 72.6 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 91.8
12% 91.8 Pts
64-Core 96.7
6% 96.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3493) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 8
Parallax 2.5
5% 5.67 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 2.8
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST340014A 40GB-$43
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 20 17 32 29 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 32.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 26.3
21% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 31%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA 320GB
191GB free
Firmware: JPFO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 83 85 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 76.2
Write 75.4
Mixed 35.9
SusWrite 83.2
49% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-VGS3 UCC Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VGS3 UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback