Intel X79G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel X79
MotherboardIntel X79G  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 16:06
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 132
58% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 571
52% 438 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 36.7
28% 36.9 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 36.4
Splatting 26.3
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 193 193 174 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 364
Write 193
Mixed 264
SusWrite 139
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 11.2
76% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 16.5
61% 128 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
324GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 87 87 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
48% Average
Read 83.5
Write 55.9
Mixed 50
SusWrite 83.7
50% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79G Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback