Compal PBL20

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCompal PBL20  (all builds)
MotherboardCompal PBL20
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110809
Uptime7 Days
Run DateJan 01 '22 at 15:26
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 102
54% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 190
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Compal(14C0 0059) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q-360 360GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180910
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 45 43 81 62 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 447
Write 241
Mixed 127
SusWrite 49.3
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 24.9
88% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 98.7
81% 119 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
349GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 79 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 74.2
Write 71.9
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 78.6
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-071.A00LF 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PBL20 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Compal PBL20

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback