Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 22.4 2-Core 44.5 25% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 85.6 8-Core 86.2 11% 85.9 Pts	64-Core 85.9 5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1018) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 1 Parallax 3.3 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.71% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 226 217 228 223 213 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 435 Write 370 Mixed 334 SusWrite 244 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 42.1 4K Mixed 30.1 97% 32 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 162 121% 160 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 1x8GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.5% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 6.8 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	11x
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	9x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	8x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	35x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 5,526 samples	8x
ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GBKingstonBench 17%, 2,515 samples	4x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	4x

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16