HP t630 Thin Client

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP t630 Thin Client  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8158
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 19:43
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 35.1
2-Core 56.4
34% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 83.2
8-Core 81.5
11% 82.3 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7E Graphics
HP(103C 8158) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.3
2% 3.97 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 95 97 98 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 346
Write 208
Mixed 189
SusWrite 102
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 31.9
100% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 150
121% 169 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 11.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical t630 Thin Client Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP t630 Thin Client

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback