DT DT135MO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDT DT135MO  (all builds)
MotherboardDT MO135
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 18:35
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD G-T56N
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 54.5
1-Core 15.3
2-Core 15.4
23% 28.4 Pts
4-Core 28.1
8-Core 32
4% 30 Pts
64-Core 37.2
2% 37.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
AMD(1002 9806) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.101.1007.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSMS180DS3128GH 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 61 54 46 43 44 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.5% Poor
Read 136
Write 118
Mixed 114
SusWrite 77.9
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 12.9
42% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 15.3
20% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DT135MO Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: DT DT135MO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback