HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 15q-bu0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8328
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 05:29
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 104
47% 76 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 162
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8328) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SUPERSONIC256 256GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0326A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 314 338 334 366 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 371
Write 285
Mixed 278
SusWrite 285
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 12.9
60% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 2.2
62% 144 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 162%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
642GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 80 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 65.8
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 77.8
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5143DB0-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.2% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 17.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15q-bu0xx Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15q-bu0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback