Lenovo 81WD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81WD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 03:41
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 70
2-Core 117
51% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 198
25% 189 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX330
Legend(17AA 3F91) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.9729
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 17.7
16% 18.1 fps
MRender 18.6
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 15.4
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFM512GDHTNI-87A0B 512GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 518 467 476 456 389 379 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 907
Write 838
Mixed 952
SusWrite 448
177% 786 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 50.5
188% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 607
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 454
346% 474 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 143%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-027.A00G Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 18.5
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81WD Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback