Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision M6800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XD1M5
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 02:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 202
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 468
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M6100
Dell(1028 15CD) 2GB
CLim: 1075 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.Q4
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 30.7
17% 26 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 23.8
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 146 155 136 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 447
Write 157
Mixed 188
SusWrite 145
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 24.9
96% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 195
151% 213 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 80%
Seagate ST500VT001-1K6142 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 0001MTC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 113 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 112
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback