Asus P7H55-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 19:36
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 76.1
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 146
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 206
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 04AF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 107 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 179
Write 112
Mixed 136
SusWrite 106
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 25.5
84% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 87.2
DQ Mixed 99.7
75% 99.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
445GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 176 177 178 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 173
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 175
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 103%
Toshiba MN04ACA400 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: FJ1M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 174 122 164 180 172 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 174
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 162
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
231% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 12.7
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $247
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback