Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek Basswood3G
Memory0.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070524
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 31.2
2-Core 62.1
34% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 103
8-Core 109
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 97.3
6% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6600
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.05% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V54OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 7.8 10 5 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 48.7
Write 51.4
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 11.4
27% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 40%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
104GB free
Firmware: V54OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 54 54 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 52.2
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 54.3
35% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 40%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.87% Terrible
Read 26.6
Write 11.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 14.6
18% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 512, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.97 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GC674AA-ABA m8120n Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion GC674AA-ABA m8120n

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback