Lenovo 90L300BMMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90L300BMMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 236
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 680
73% 580 Pts
64-Core 701
43% 701 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Zotac(19DA C530) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.6% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 105
Parallax 108
91% 108 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 96.6
Splatting 88.8
84% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1001 512GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10160101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,424
Write 1,944
Mixed 1,374
355% 1,581 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 55.1
192% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,533
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 1,219
887% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 264%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
95GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 199 201 300 203 265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 282
Write 102
Mixed 324
SusWrite 244
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 30.9
116% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 164
151% 230 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 24.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90L300BMMW Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 90L300BMMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback