Samsung 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT500R5N-X58D
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180103
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 495
56% 441 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Sanyo(144D C792) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9907
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 11.6
12% 14 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 15
Splatting 12.4
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT22K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 158 158 157 157 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 420
Write 405
Mixed 369
SusWrite 147
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 47.7
152% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 22.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 500R5N/500R5Y/501R5N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback