Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q736

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q736 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB299
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	15 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '21 at 03:09
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	59%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300U 59,619 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 66.9 1-Core 45.8 2-Core 81.7 42% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 128 17% 128 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Fujitsu(10CF 18D1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6951 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.1 5% 4.73 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 6.4 5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-00000 128GB 476 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 122 125 122 124 120 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 390 Write 136 Mixed 165 SusWrite 125 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 17.5 84% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 352 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 172 143% 213 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 89%
SDXC 63GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 44GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 18 18 20 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 2x4GB 26,293 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.7% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 17.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STYLISTIC Q736 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu STYLISTIC Q736

CPU
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples	11x
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples	3x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	15x

SSD
MZNTY128HDHP-00007 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 78 samples	4x
MZNLN128HCGR-00007 128GBSamsungBench 70%, 28 samples	4x
RTHMB256VBM4MWDL 256GBBench 55%, 130 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBSamsungBench 59%, 26,293 samples	14x
2x4GBHynixBench 60%, 11,918 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16