Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210120
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '21 at 19:54
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 85.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 289 95% 174 Pts	4-Core 581 8-Core 1,017 97% 799 Pts	64-Core 1555 96% 1555 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 104%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e1000 512G 512GB 1,223 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFMB0E5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,226 Write 1,766 Mixed 1,294 321% 1,429 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 58.9 199% 72.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,203 DQ Write 851 DQ Mixed 1,089 796% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 87% Great: 259%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 13,327 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 881GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 166 170 170 169 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingmax GZOH23F-28---------- 1x16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	235x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	136x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	130x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	235x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	204x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	178x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $489

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16