Lenovo 20FXS0SQ05

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FXS0SQ05  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXS0SQ05
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 15:54
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 164
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 515
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 5050) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8512
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 11.4
10% 11.8 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 9.4
8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 416 410 406 414 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 373
Mixed 307
SusWrite 399
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 44.3
143% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 281
216% 297 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB M471A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 23
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FXS0SQ05 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FXS0SQ05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback