Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 15:05
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 36.6
2-Core 69.2
36% 54.9 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 130
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.32% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.32%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 73 71 73 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 65.3
Write 75
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 71.7
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback