Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Satellite E205 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '21 at 04:04
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 M 640 5,045 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Memory 61 1-Core 84 2-Core 132 54% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 171 22% 169 Pts	64-Core 172 11% 172 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF20) 512MB Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.4201 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.3 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 408GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 211 211 210 213 208 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.6% Above average	Read 224 Write 212 Mixed 208 SusWrite 209 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 21.3 74% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 170 DQ Mixed 180 135% 180 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB 4,853 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.6 24% 8.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.2 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	11x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	4x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	3x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	3x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85