Medion MD34173/C719

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion MD34173/C719  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z370H4-EM
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 23:35
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 743
68% 572 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Elitegroup(1019 1042) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31.1
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 28.8
25% 30.4 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 22.3
24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 612
Write 366
Mixed 421
103% 466 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 43.6
154% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 179
158% 228 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
604GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 155 157 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 181
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 161
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
117% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34173/C719 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Medion MD34173/C719

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback