Asus Z87-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z87-A  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 13:26
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 111
2-Core 191
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 526
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.3% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 122
Parallax 75.4
59% 90.1 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 66.4
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 213 218 216 216 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 469
Write 446
Mixed 329
SusWrite 222
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 28.6
120% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 218
196% 297 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 111%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 73 60 63 74 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
924GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 118 116 129 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 155
Write 85.5
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 118
71% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate BlackArmorDAS35 2TB
242GB free, PID 3401
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 40 42 42 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 18.1
Write 15.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 41.7
36% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.6
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 99U5471-066.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 19.4
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-A Builds (Compare 2,952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-A - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback