Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 12:20
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 90.4
41% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 135
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 60.3
51% 62.8 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 60.1
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 325 353 314 348 368 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 840
Write 931
Mixed 773
SusWrite 349
162% 723 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 33.6
105% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 343
266% 372 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 105%
Great: 237%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
931GB free
Firmware: HPM6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 107 116 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 118
Write 81.7
Mixed 62.9
SusWrite 109
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.7
336% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 65%
JMicron Generic DISK00 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 80 90 86 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 88.3
Write 83.2
Mixed 59
SusWrite 81.6
105% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36%
Great: 71%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-22G9B1 500GB
466GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 57 65 63 66 69 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.5% Below average
Read 86
Write 83.4
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 60.2
92% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
TOSHIBA MD04ACA500 5TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 24 26 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 24.8
90% 71 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 3.3 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 78 90 87 88 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 137
Write 150
Mixed 94.6
SusWrite 80.7
154% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
176% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK02 14TB
973GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 80 90 87 88 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
Read 197
Write 194
Mixed 140
SusWrite 81.6
200% 153 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.6
198% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 75%
WDC WD80 EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 23 24 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 118
Write 139
Mixed 80
SusWrite 23
117% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
176% 2.17 MB/s
TOSHIBA HDWE150 5TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 24 26 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
Read 103
Write 105
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 24.7
89% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
124% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 44%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $3,464
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback