Hp-pavilion KE494AA-ABV dx2290MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion KE494AA-ABV dx2290MT  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Livermore8
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 07:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4600
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 31
2-Core 60.7
37% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 61.3
8-Core 61.1
8% 61.2 Pts
64-Core 61.6
4% 61.6 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 365.19
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 0.8
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
919GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 91 119 130 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
75% Very good
Read 147
Write 134
Mixed 20
SusWrite 115
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75%
Great: 79%
Fc-1307 SD to CF Adapter V1.4 63GB
39GB free
Firmware: Rev 1.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 9.9 10 11 11 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 11
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 10.7
11% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.6
593% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KE494AA-ABV dx2290MT Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion KE494AA-ABV dx2290MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback