Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 43 34% 46 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 330 25% 224 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PNY(196E 0974) 2GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.28% Terrible	Lighting 9.2 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 12.9 8% 11.3 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 12 Splatting 10.7 10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.28% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 813GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 90 75 94 84 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 182 Write 98 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 85.3 72% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	20x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	7x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $210