Lenovo 30AGS1CE00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30AGS1CE00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory13.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1281 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 192
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 533
54% 439 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 20.7
13% 21.2 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 24.5
18% 21.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 30 51 32 52 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 360
Write 48
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 41
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 29.5
117% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 79.8
64% 94.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57%
Great: 107%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
922GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 188 189 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 125
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 187
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.4
287% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
119GB free
Firmware: 1201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 61 60 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 62.8
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 59.8
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1337 FLGE85F-C8KJB Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 18GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30AGS1CE00 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 30AGS1CE00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback