Medion P6689 MD61022

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMedion P6689 MD61022  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION E15KRR
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170726
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateDec 27 '21 at 12:34
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 437
53% 405 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 22C4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 8
6% 15.9 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 7
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 97 75 65 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 411
Write 132
Mixed 154
SusWrite 92.1
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 15.8
62% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 123
121% 198 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 1TB
767GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 119 124 124 125 125 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 82.7
Write 89
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 120
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
203% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6689 MD61022 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Medion P6689 MD61022

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback