Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 208 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 572 57% 467 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0423A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 430 Write 395 Mixed 349 87% 391 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 46.1 151% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 42.2 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 57.5 48% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 114%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 80GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 151 151 151 151 151 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 327 Write 407 Mixed 335 SusWrite 183 71% 313 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 42.6 140% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 39.1 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 50.1 41% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 115%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 560GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 114 Write 123 Mixed 72.9 SusWrite 85.3 73% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX16GX3M2A1333C9 029E CM3B8G2C1600L11 029E CMX8GX3M1A1333C9 029E CM3B8G2C1600L11 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 8GBCorsairBench 51%, 137 samples	9x
CML16GX3M2A1600C10 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 16GBCorsairBench 48%, 91 samples	8x
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GBKingstonBench 50%, 248 samples	8x

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $474

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16