Foxconn ELA01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFoxconn ELA01  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN ELA01
Memory2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '21 at 22:55
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 50.8
2-Core 98.8
47% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 203
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 260-$250
MSI(1462 1771) 896MB
Ram: 896MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 5.7
10% 10.5 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 3.9
6% 7.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 236 238 241 171 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64% Good
Read 259
Write 245
Mixed 247
SusWrite 207
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 32.9
104% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 191
142% 187 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 100 100 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 102
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 100
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 61%
Kingston DT 101 G2 4GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.1
Write 8.8
Mixed 5.3
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ELA01 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Foxconn ELA01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback